Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on knowledge, perceptions, and effects of telemedicine among the general population of Pakistan: A national survey.

Background: Telemedicine is the provision of healthcare services through information and communication technology with the potential to mobilize all facets of the health sector to prevent the spread of COVID-19, provide quality healthcare, protect patients, doctors, and the public from exposure to disease, and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aims to identify knowledge, perceptions, willingness to use, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine awareness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 27 May 2020 to 17 June 2020 using the convenient sampling technique in the general population of Pakistan. Data were collected by designing an online questionnaire consisting of demographic information, knowledge, attitude perceptions, barriers, utilization, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine. Results: Of the 602 participants included in the study, 70.1% had heard about telemedicine, 54.3% had a good understanding of the definition of "telemedicine," 81.4% had not used telemedicine in the past, 29.9% did not know that telemedicine was available before the COVID-19 pandemic, and 70.4% responded that the COVID-19 pandemic had changed their attitudes toward telemedicine. Gender (p = 0.017) and family income (p = 0.027) had a significant association with the perception of the benefits of telemedicine. Conclusion: The knowledge and usage of telemedicine are lacking due to inadequate awareness and technology. The need of the hour is to maximize the application of telemedicine to overcome the deficiencies of the healthcare system. Hence, it is essential to increase awareness through various means and develop an appropriate infrastructure to attain maximum benefits from telehealth services.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on knowledge, perceptions, and effects of telemedicine among the general population of Pakistan: A national survey

Background Telemedicine is the provision of healthcare services through information and communication technology with the potential to mobilize all facets of the health sector to prevent the spread of COVID-19, provide quality healthcare, protect patients, doctors, and the public from exposure to disease, and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aims to identify knowledge, perceptions, willingness to use, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine awareness. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from 27 May 2020 to 17 June 2020 using the convenient sampling technique in the general population of Pakistan. Data were collected by designing an online questionnaire consisting of demographic information, knowledge, attitude perceptions, barriers, utilization, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine. Results Of the 602 participants included in the study, 70.1% had heard about telemedicine, 54.3% had a good understanding of the definition of "telemedicine,” 81.4% had not used telemedicine in the past, 29.9% did not know that telemedicine was available before the COVID-19 pandemic, and 70.4% responded that the COVID-19 pandemic had changed their attitudes toward telemedicine. Gender (p = 0.017) and family income (p = 0.027) had a significant association with the perception of the benefits of telemedicine. Conclusion The knowledge and usage of telemedicine are lacking due to inadequate awareness and technology. The need of the hour is to maximize the application of telemedicine to overcome the deficiencies of the healthcare system. Hence, it is essential to increase awareness through various means and develop an appropriate infrastructure to attain maximum benefits from telehealth services.

Assessing the Dynamic Outcomes of Containment Strategies against COVID-19 under Different Public Health Governance Structures: A Comparison between Pakistan and Bangladesh.

COVID-19 scenarios were run using an epidemiological mathematical model (system dynamics model) and counterfactual analysis to simulate the impacts of different control and containment measures on cumulative infections and deaths in Bangladesh and Pakistan. The simulations were based on national-level data concerning vaccination level, hospital capacity, and other factors, from the World Health Organization, the World Bank, and the Our World in Data web portal. These data were added to cumulative infections and death data from government agencies covering the period from 18 March 2020 to 28 February 2022. Baseline curves for Pakistan and Bangladesh were obtained using piecewise fitting with a consideration of different events against the reported data and allowing for less than 5% random errors in cumulative infections and deaths. The results indicate that Bangladesh could have achieved more reductions in each key outcome measure by shifting its initial lockdown at least five days backward, while Pakistan would have needed to extend its lockdown to achieve comparable improvements. Bangladesh's second lockdown appears to have been better timed than Pakistan's. There were potential benefits from starting the third lockdown two weeks earlier for Bangladesh and from combining this with the fourth lockdown or canceling the fourth lockdown altogether. Adding a two-week lockdown at the beginning of the upward slope of the second wave could have led to a more than 40 percent reduction in cumulative infections and a 35 percent reduction in cumulative deaths for both countries. However, Bangladesh's reductions were more sensitive to the duration of the lockdown. Pakistan's response was more constrained by medical resources, while Bangladesh's outcomes were more sensitive to both vaccination timing and capacities. More benefits were lost when combining multiple scenarios for Bangladesh compared to the same combinations in Pakistan. Clearly, cumulative infections and deaths could have been highly impacted by adjusting the control and containment measures in both national settings. However, COVID-19 outcomes were more sensitive to adjustment interventions for the Bangladesh context. Disaggregated analyses, using a wider range of factors, may reveal several sub-national dynamics. Nonetheless, the current research demonstrates the relevance of lockdown timing adjustments and discrete adjustments to several other control and containment measures.

The Mediating Role Of Team Effectiveness On The Relationship Between Industry 4.0 Technologies And Operational Performance Improvement

Purpose- Current study examines how Industry 4.0 technologies affect operational performance improvement. The study also examined the mediation effect of team effectiveness that almost neglected in the previously conducted studies. Design/methodology/approach - The target population was operations managers in the textile sector. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire from 153 respondents was subjected to PLS-SEM for analysis. Findings - Findings revealed that team effectiveness is the significant antecedent for Industry 4.0 technologies. Moreover, found that team effectiveness positively contributes to performance improvement initiatives in the textile sector of Punjab. Furthermore, the results show, if the employees involved as a team in decision making and implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies, they feel motivated and perform better. Further, the results show that team effectiveness mediates among Industry 4.0 technologies and performance improvement initiatives. Practical implications - Current study provides valued practical implications for the top management and policymakers to ensure the team effectiveness towards Industry 4.0 technologies to get performance improvement initiatives. Originality/value - The proposed model considers the cyber-physical system (CPS) and the social constructionist theory (CST) in the domain of Industry 4.0 technologies to tackle team effectiveness. The current study is the novel addition in the literature by using team effectiveness as a mediator. Furthermore, it ascertains that Industry 4.0 technologies are anticipated to be a game-changing player in operational performance improvement.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by using real-time PCR nasopharyngeal swabs in suspected patients and their clinical medication.

BACKGROUND: The corona name derived from their crown like spike proteins attach with cell receptors. It belongs to coronaviradae family and nideovirales order, envelop virus, size range 65-125 â€‹nm and positive single standard RNA between 26.4 and 31.7 â€‹kb and contain 7096 amino acid. There are four subtypes that have been detected these are alpha, beta, gamma and delta. METHODOLOGY: The 267 covid-19 blood and nasopharyngeal samples were collected from Multan region. RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal samples and run the PCR. The blood samples use for clinical tests, Lactate dehydrogenase, serum ferritin level, D-Dimer, TG, cholesterol, thyphoidot, HDL, lymphocyte count and CRP. RESULTS: 127 (47.21%) out of 267 patients were covid-19 PCR positive and showed the amplification of ORF1ab, E, and N gene, while 140 individuals were covid-19 PCR negative and not showed the amplification of ORF1ab, E and N gene. The patients with negative Covid-19 PCR, the other analysis tests such as lactate dehydrogenase, HDL, ferritin, ESR, CBP, D-Dimer, Tg, cholesterol, CRP and CT scan. The patients effected covid-19 have higher values of D-Dimer, ESR, Neutrophils, LDH, CRP and ferritin level than normal ranges. However, the values of HDL, cholesterol and lymphocytes were decreased from the normal range.

Hamman-Rich Syndrome: A Diagnosis of Exclusion in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hamman-Rich syndrome is a rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with acute respiratory distress syndrome physiology. It carries a grave prognosis and a high early mortality rate. It is often distinguished from other similar pulmonary pathologies based on the clinical course, laboratory findings, bronchoalveolar lavage testing, and pathology report. We detail a 77-year-old lady with no prior pulmonary disease, smoking history, or occupational and environmental exposures present to the emergency department found to be in acute hypoxic respiratory failure with impressive progressive radiographic findings. The presumptive diagnosis of Hamman-Rich syndrome was made based on a combination of factors after ruling out other similar clinical entities, especially in the setting of an ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients With a Focus on the Role of Renal Replacement Therapy: A Review of What We Know So Far.

Acute renal failure remains a significant concern in all patients with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Management is particularly challenging in critically ill patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Supportive care in the form of accurate volume correction and avoiding nephrotoxic agents are the chief cornerstone of the management of these patients. The pathophysiology of acute renal failure in COVID-19 is multifactorial, with significant contributions from excessive cytokine release. Gaining a better insight into the pathophysiology of renal failure will hopefully help develop more directed treatment options. A considerable number of these patients deteriorate despite adequate supportive care owing to the complexity of the disease and multi-organ involvement. Renal replacement therapy is used for a long time in critically ill septic patients who develop progressive renal failure despite adequate conservative support. Timing and choice of renal replacement therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains an area of future research that may help decrease mortality in this patient population.